Unveiling the Sociometer Theory and Baumeister's Social Pain Theory: Exploring In-Group Rejection's Emotional Impact

조회수 197

In the intricate landscape of human social dynamics, two influential psychological theories shed light on the impact of social connections, rejection, and the dynamics of belonging. The Sociometer Theory, encompassing the need to belong, and Baumeister's Social Pain Theory offer invaluable insights into experiences of social rejection, revealing the complexities of relational evaluation and the intensified emotional response to in-group rejection.

The Sociometer Theory and the Need to Belong

The Sociometer Theory, proposed by Mark Leary, suggests that humans possess an internal gauge or "sociometer" that monitors social acceptance and belongingness. It asserts that the need to belong is ingrained within humans as a fundamental aspect of social well-being. The sociometer, an in-built alarm system of sorts, is thought to keep track of any and all signs of social inclusion or exclusion, which allows the mind to get a sense of how well we belong. It is said that the stronger our sense of belonging is, the higher our level of well-being stays. Conversely, the more rejection our sociometer measures, the more anxious and mentally unstable we become. Leary posits that what our sociometer is actually measuring is more commonly known as our ‘self-esteem.’

Baumeister's Social Pain Theory

Baumeister takes this line of reasoning even further, delving into the experience of social pain, suggesting that social rejection or exclusion (which is noticed by our sociometers) triggers feelings of "social pain" akin to physical pain. In his research, Baumeister found that the brain processes social and physical pain using similar neural pathways, which indicates that social rejection can evoke genuine emotional distress and actual pain.

Social pain and In-Group Rejection

Going another step further, Baumeister’s research indicated that we feel this social pain that comes with rejection much more strongly if the rejection comes from a source that is held we hold in high esteem. That is to say, a source that we value, love, or respect. To use terms from the social identity theory, when we are rejected by someone from our in-group, we feel that pain much more strongly than someone from our out-group. 

Relational evaluation, a critical component of social cognition, shapes how individuals perceive and respond to social rejection. Studies suggest that individuals tend to experience heightened emotional distress when facing rejection from their in-group compared to their out-group.

Implications of the Sociometer and Social Pain Theory

If In-group rejection holds greater emotional weight – and thus hurts more – due to the deeper investment in relationships within one's social circle, then it stands to reason that out-group rejection hurts much less. 

So what does that mean for group formation? What large-scale social trends might we find if we apply Leary and Baumeister’s insights on society as a whole? To answer that question, we will turn to another great name in the field of psychology.

Sigmund Freud.

Twin Mountain Company (트윈 마운틴 컴퍼니) l CEO: Eerae Park ㅣ Location: 47, 9 beon-gil, Simgo-ro, Bucheon-si, Korea ㅣ Registration number: 652-53-00092 l Privacy office: Eerae Park

Hosting by: (주)아임웹


info@booksmart-academy.com ㅣ +82 070 8080 4832